Repatriation is a complex topic, intersecting with many subjects including law, ethics, and curatorial practices. This page aims to help you better understand important aspects of repatriation.
This timeline highlights major laws, guidelines, and some of the repatriation cases that have happened over the past 70 years. It focuses on the UK, but includes relevant international events as well.
Terms used while talking about repatriation are often specific to the field and may be unfamiliar. It is important that we are all on the same page when talking about these important concepts, so The Homebound Project has compiled a list of terms connected to repatriation.
This UK-based organization was created to help promote the repatriation process in the UK. Their website has many great resources, as highlighted in this section.
This section provides recent news stories about repatriation—both successes and failures. It also includes journal articles on repatriation, if you are interested in the field from an academic perspective.

1963
This act effectively prohibits repatriation from the British Museum. Importantly, this act only applies to the British Museum.


1983
In terms of repatriation, this act means that the Armouries, Science Museum, Victoria and Albert Museum, and Royal Botanic Gardens in Kew cannot dispose of items in their collections unless it is a duplicate, or is deemed 'useless for the purposes of their collections', through damage, infestation, or deterioration.


1989
This United States act requires the Smithsonian to inventory and return certain Indigenous American ancestral remains and cultural items. This act has inspired the demand for similar acts and policies around the world.


1990
This United States act provides a legal process for the return of Indigenous American ancestral remains and cultural objects. Similar to NMAIA, NAGPRA influenced the international movement to return indigenous human remains and sacred objects.


1991
This constitutes the first official repatriation of Indigenous ancestal remains from the UK.


1999
Kelvingrove Art Gallery, Scotland repatriates a Ghost Dance Shirt to the Lakota nation.


2001
This working group, established by the UK Government, would lead to the publication of ‘Guidance for the Care of Human Remains in Museums’ in 2005.


2004
This act regulates the removal, storage, and use of human tissue. In terms of repatriation, it allows the British Museum and other national museums to transfer human remains out of their collections. This act only applies to England, Wales, and Northern Ireland; Scotland would pass their own Human Tissue Act in 2006.


2005
Released by the UK Government’s Department of Culture, Media and Sport as a result of the Working Group on Human Remains in UK Museum Collections, this document ‘provides guidance for museums and other institutions in England, Wales and Northern Ireland that hold human remains in permanent collections’. This is the first official guidance on the care and repatriation of human remains for institutions in the UK. It is important to note that this guide is not legally binding.


2005
The Australian Government makes a formal request for the repatriation of five Aboriginal ancestral remains held by the Brighton & Hove Museums. This highlights the leading role colonial nation states were beginning to take in international Indigenous repatriation, oftentimes at the expense of Indigenous nations and groups.


2007
This document, adopted by the UN General Assembly, is not a binding treaty but an aspirational declaration that establishes a universal framework of minimum standards for Indigenous people, including rights to cultural heritage. It is worth nothing that four countries voted against this act: The US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. However, all four have since signed it.


2009
This act creates a legal framework for the restitution on Nazi-looted art. Although it does not apply specifically to Indigenous heritage, it sets a precedent for government legislation surrounding the repatriation of cultural objects.


2017
These ancestors were held in the Pitt Rivers Museum.


2019
These cultural objects were repatriated to four different Aboriginal communities.


2021
This is the first time a UK institution unconditionally returnes a Benin Bronze.


2021
This amendment includes a section that simplifies the legal process for museums and galleries registered as charities to return objects in certain circumstances, aiding the repatriation process. The government has ensured, however, that this legislation does not apply to 16 national museums, including the British Museum and the National Gallery.


2023
This guide, sponsored by Arts Council England, provides 'guidance to support the museums sector in matters related to the restitution and repatriation of cultural objects.' Importantly, it is not legally binding.


2024
The spears, held by Cambridge’s Museum of Archeology and Anthropology, were originally taken by James Cook in 1770 from Kamay (Botany Bay).


2025
These ancestors were repatriated to four different Aboriginal communities.


2025
The Aboriginal objects, including spears, spear throwers, and a club, were taken in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.


A
Ancestors / Ancestral Remains
Ancestors, also referred to as Ancestral Remains, are the physical remains of an Indigenous person. This term acknowledges the family lineage and living spirit of the deceased and emphasizes the ancestor’s cultural and spiritual importance to their living relatives.
Learn more: https://repatriates.org/glossary/ https://www.aboriginalheritagecouncil.vic.gov.au/report-ancestral-remains
C
Collecting Institutions
Museums, universities, and government bodies holding Indigenous objects and ancestors.
Country/Land
Country or Land in the Indigenous context refers not just to geography but to a deep connection to an ancestral home.
"Land is not just where they live - land is identity, family, culture and lore.'' - National Indigenous Times
"Country is the term often used by Aboriginal peoples to describe the lands, waterways and seas to which they are connected. The term contains complex ideas about law, place, custom, language, spiritual belief, cultural practice, material sustenance, family and identity." - AIATSIS
Link to National Indigenous Times article: https://shorturl.at/4RavD
Link to AIATSIS article: https://aiatsis.gov.au/explore/welcome-country
Cultural Affiliation
Cultural Affiliation is the relationship between a present-day Indigenous nation or group and earlier nations and groups, used to establish rights to objects and ancestors. This term is used in NAGPRA (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act), the US law which mandates terms of repatriation in the US. Although NAGPRA does not apply in the UK, Cultural Affiliation can still help build the case for the repatriation of objects and ancestors.
Learn more: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nagpra/glossary.htm
Cultural Heritage
Cultural Heritage is something that is meaningful and connected to Indigenous identity. It is a vast concept referring to artistic, historical, religious, and cultural objects, as well as songs, stories, dances, knowledge, practices, and ceremonies. It can also include Indigenous land and country.
To learn more about this term in different Indigenous contexts, see:
https://heritage-toolkit.fpcc.ca/what-is-indigenous-cultural-heritage/
https://www.aboriginalheritagecouncil.vic.gov.au/aboriginal-heritage
D
Decolonization (of museums)
Decolonization is the process of dismantling colonial rule, systems, and ideologies to restore sovereignty to colonized lands and peoples. In the museum setting, this looks like reversing unethical collecting and displaying legacies, removing secret-sacred items and ancestors from sight, giving Indigenous nations full control over both physical and digital displays that contain their cultural heritage, and repatriating objects and ancestors.
F
Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)
Free, Prior and Informed Consent refers to a right of Indigenous people outlined in UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples), which allows Indigenous people to give or withhold consent to projects affecting them or their resources. In terms of repatriation, it also applies retroactively to ‘cultural, intellectual, religious and spiritual property taken without their [Indigenous peoples’] free, prior and informed consent or in violation of their laws, traditions and customs.’ Importantly, the UK voted in favor when this document was adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2007.
UNDRIP link: https://shorturl.at/qDFam
Learn more: https://shorturl.at/wXytC
Funerary Objects
Funerary Objects refer to items placed with ancestral remains as part of a death rite or ceremony. This term is used in NAGPRA (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act), the US law which mandates terms of repatriation in the US. Although NAGPRA does not apply in the UK, defining Funerary Objects as their own category can help build the case for their repatriation.
Learn more: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nagpra/glossary.htm
P
Provenance
Provenance refers to the history of an object, including where it was removed from and its chain of custody after collection. In repatriation, this research is critical for identifying the origin of an object and its journey into an institution's or individual's collection, which helps establish the rightful community for return. In Indigenous contexts, provenance is often complex, with many objects having vague or disputed histories, having been taken under duress or removed without consent.
R
Rematriation
Rematriation is an alternative term to repatriation, proposed due to the connotations of patriarchy and ownership associated with the term repatriation. The idea of rematriation emerges from Indigenous feminist paradigms that emphasize returning sacred items to Mother Earth, focusing on restoring balance, healing, and cultural revitalization rather than just legal transfer. The Homebound Project fully supports the concepts behind the term rematriation and in many cases prefers it to the term repatriation. However, because the term most commonly used and recognized globally is repatriation, we often use repatriation instead.
Learn more: https://repatriates.org/glossary/
rematriation.org
Repatriation
Repatriation is the process of returning cultural objects and ancestral remains to the Indigenous communities from which they were taken. Some institutions define repatriation as the process by which objects and ancestors are returned specifically to a nation-state; The Homebound Project aims to bypass nation-states as much as possible, preferring to work directly with Indigenous communities, and thus does not use the term repatriation in that sense.
Restitution
Restitution is defined as the process by which cultural objects and ancestors are returned to an individual or a community (as opposed to a nation state as can be implied by the term repatriation). However, restitution and repatriation are often used interchangeably, particularly in Europe. The Homebound Project uses the terms repatriation, restitution, and rematriation to represent the same concept: the return of ancestors and objects back to the Indigenous lands from where they came.
S
Secret-Sacred Objects
Secret-sacred objects are culturally sensitive items that are restricted (by touch or sight) to initiated individuals, certain genders, or specific ceremonial uses.These objects often possess deep spiritual significance for Indigenous communities and should be respected by all as dictated by traditional law and customs.
Routes to Return
This page gives an in-depth review on repatriation policy in the United Kingdom, as well as the policies of specific museums and institutions within the UK. It also provides links to the collection databases of those museums, which can be used to search for specific items and ancestors.
Routes to Return
This Interactive map allows you to click on different European countries and find out more about their repatriation policies
Routes to Return
This page gives advice on the state of repatriation in Europe more generally.
Routes to Return
The International Repatriation Network ‘seeks to bring together community members, practitioners, and academics working on repatriation, to focus on building momentum and a community of practice.’ This link takes you to a page where you can view the Members Directory or sign up for the Network yourself.
News
Ownership of more than 100 artefacts stolen by the British military from Africa in the late 19th Century and housed at the University of Cambridge has been officially transferred to Nigeria.
News
30 Jan. 2026
University of Edinburgh returns six Native American skulls to Muscogee Nation
Six Native American skulls, acquired to advance the pseudoscience of phrenology, have been returned by the University of Edinburgh to the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, a self-governed Native American Tribal Nation.
News
2 Sept. 2025
Bristol Museum & Art Gallery has formally returned 33 culturally significant objects to the Larrakia People of Darwin in Australia’s Northern Territory.
News
A unique shell necklace believed to originate from the Bass Strait islands has been returned by The Hunterian collection, the oldest public museum in Scotland, to representatives from the Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre (TAC) who travelled to Glasgow to carry it home.